The camp of former House Speaker Martin Romualdez has asked the Office of the Ombudsman to inhibit itself from investigating him in connection with a flood control controversy, alleging that the probe has been tainted by prejudgment and a violation of due process, as reported by RH Milky Rigonan.

In a four-page letter dated April 22, 2026, addressed to Ombudsman Jesus Crispin "Boying" Remulla, lawyers from Villaraza & Angangco, known as “The Firm,” argued that public statements from the Ombudsman and its officials indicate that Romualdez has effectively been pre-judged even before the filing of a formal complaint and the conduct of a preliminary investigation.

The legal team said the pattern of statements shows “clear prejudgment,” citing remarks made as early as November 2025, when Remulla disclosed that the office was already studying the case and that possible plunder charges were being considered.

They also pointed to April 2026 public pronouncements in which the Ombudsman reportedly described the matter as potentially involving plunder based on alleged conspiracy and multiple acts.

Romualdez’s lawyers argued that such statements undermine the appearance of impartiality required in quasi-judicial proceedings and risk compromising the fairness of any resulting investigation.

Citing jurisprudence on the “appearance of impartiality,” the camp said the Ombudsman should voluntarily inhibit from handling the case and allow an independent and neutral body to take over the inquiry.

The Office of the Ombudsman has not yet publicly responded to the request.